A strategic guide on how to use email marketing across the funnel
Author
Yevheniia Pashaieva
Yevheniia has been a professional copywriter since 2014. Her vast experience in writing for marketing, e-commerce, fin-tech, and pharmaceutical businesses in B2B and B2C enables her to craft resonating content of any complexity.
Reviewed by
Margaret Lee
Margot, a CMO of Belkins, is a seasoned professional with over 14 years of experience and a remarkable track record of managing marketing teams.
Updated:2026-03-16
Reading time:13m
We created this exhaustive guide to give you a fail-proof approach to B2B lead-gen email marketing and watch your conversions soar. Let's get started.
But that’s exactly why emails don’t impress anyone anymore — they feel like the same narrative from different senders.
At Belkins, we’ve seen this shift firsthand. Over the past decade, we’ve run allbound campaigns for 1000+ B2B companies across different industries and markets — from early-stage startups to enterprise organizations.
That experience gave us a unique dataset on what actually works today in different types of outreach: cold outbound, nurturing sequences, newsletters, LinkedIn campaigns, cold calls, paid advertising, and other inbound or outbound touchpoints.
And what we see is a clear pattern: the tactics that worked a few years ago don’t work the same way anymore.
Once a tactic starts working, everyone copies it, and it quickly loses impact. That’s why the typical ‘Hi, want to buy?’ email doesn’t work anymore, and neither do psychological tricks to force replies. What works now is simple: every interaction should give value — share expertise, discuss real challenges, and make the conversation useful from the first touch.
To stand out today, an email needs to do much more than just land in the inbox. It has to:
Deliver value before asking for attention
Align with the current stage your prospect is at
Work inside a coordinated strategy, preferably omnichannel
Act like a connector between intent, content, and sales
So, instead of asking “How many emails should we send?”, the real question becomes “How should email work across the entire buyer journey?”
Let’s break down how email marketing supports different stages of the funnel and how to make it drive meaningful conversations.
Using email marketing for different B2B goals
Cold outreach alone is like an energy bar: it gives you a quick energy boost, which drains quickly. Nurturing is like a full meal — it takes time to prepare, but it sustains you longer.
In B2B, you need both.
The right email marketing strategy supports different stages across the funnel:
Brand awareness and trust building
Lead nurturing and intent development
Lead generation and sales activation
Each of them requires different messaging, cadence, and KPIs.
Brand awareness and trust building (top of the funnel)
Goal: Build credibility and stay visible to buyers before they’re ready to talk.
At the top of the funnel, your potential buyer is not thinking “Which vendor should I choose?” Mostly, they don’t even realize there’s an issue. But even if they do, they ask themselves:
“Is this even a problem?”
“How serious is it?” or “What consequences can it have?”
“What are others doing about it?”
“Do I need to care about this right now?”
If your first email says “Book a demo,” you’ve skipped at least four consideration stages, and prospects feel that gap. As a result, their trust drops instantly.
Instead, email at this stage should do four very specific things. Let’s unpack each one.
Reinforce your brand narrative
In other words, it’s how you tell others what you think on this or that topic, how you see the world. Your brand narrative answers:
What do we believe about this market?
What mistakes do we see companies making?
What shift is happening in the industry?
What future are we helping shape?
Example: Compare the subject lines below.
❌
✅
Boost your sales with our AI platform
Outbound reply rates dropped 37% this year. Here’s why
The first one is bad because it’s quite generic, vendor-focused, and centered on pushing your product.
The second one is much better for this stage and goal, as you’re framing the industry and highlighting that “We understand this market deeply.” Inside the email, you can add:
A brief analysis of the current market situation
2–3 data points to support your claims
Reasons for the shift in buyer behavior
A soft CTA, inviting them to find out more about what to do
And that’s a narrative.
Educate without pitching
Education at the top of the funnel (TOFU) should expand awareness, introduce proven frameworks, and help buyers realize they have an issue. Also, it should make the buyer slightly smarter in, let’s say, 2 minutes. Here are some ideas for educational content:
Checklists
Mini frameworks
Quick diagnostic questions
Before/after comparisons
Data-backed benchmarks
If you pitch too early, you communicate: “I care more about closing than about understanding.” And potential buyers can sense that instantly.
Example: Let’s say you sell revenue operations consulting and want to send an educational email.
❌
✅
Struggling with RevOps? Book a 30-min audit.
3 revenue leaks we keep seeing in SaaS companies scaling past $20M ARR
Again, the second one is better because you’re not selling. The structure of such an email can be as follows:
Name those revenue leaks + the reasons behind them
Suggest a real example
Share a micro-framework to address those issues
Finish with a soft CTA, inviting them to read/discover more
Now, when the problem escalates, they might remember you.
Deliver insights buyers can use immediately
This is where most newsletters fail, because they often summarize content, promote assets, or recycle announcements. High-performing TOFU emails, in contrast, give immediate value.
Example structure:
Subject: Why 60% of outbound fails before email #3
Body:
2-sentence insight
Short explanation
1 tactical takeaway they can apply tomorrow (e.g., “If your first follow-up doesn’t add new information, you’re not following up, you’re nagging.”)
Overall, your key goal should be to equip your potential clients with practical tools and insights to help them operate better.
Here are some more immediate-use content ideas:
“If you’re attending X conference, ask this question.”
“Before running your next campaign, check these 3 signals.”
“If reply rates have dropped, audit these 2 things first.”
Position yourself as an industry authority
You can say you’re an expert in something 1,000 times, but actual expertise comes from:
Data
Specificity
Strong opinions backed by experience
Pattern recognition
Here are some of the ways for you to signal your credibility in email:
Reference real campaign results
Share internal benchmarks
Explain when and why something doesn’t work
Break common myths using some practical examples
Share behind-the-scenes insights, playbooks, processes, etc.
For example:
“We’ve seen highly specialized companies outperform category leaders in reply rates by 47% because it’s easier to target a sharp pain than a broad issue.”
That kind of insight changes how buyers think.
Another example of statements demonstrating weak and strong authority:
❌
✅
Email marketing is powerful.
Event-based outreach often doubles reply rates, but appointment quality varies depending on ICP maturity.
The second one is much more specific and shows you’ve got hands-on experience with different email campaigns. Real-life cases or numbers added to that message will only reinforce it.
Lead nurturing and intent development (middle of the funnel)
Goal: Turn interest into buying intent.
This is where email stops being broadcast and becomes behavioral. In other words, at the awareness stage, you educate, and at the nurturing stage, you respond.
Nurturing does three things exceptionally well:
Reduces perceived risk
Builds category trust
Aligns timing without forcing it
In long B2B sales cycles, you can’t predict when budgets will be unlocked or priorities will shift.
You can, however, ensure that you’re visible, credible, and relevant when they do.
When to start nurturing
People move from awareness to nurturing when engagement compounds.
At Belkins, we track lifecycle progression inside HubSpot and pay attention to these engagement signals:
Page views
Content downloads
Webinar registrations
Repeat email clicks
These interactions feed into engagement scoring and influence lifecycle movement: Lead → MQL → SQL.
Here are some examples of how we actually score those interactions:
When a lead gets a total of 40 points, it prompts our business development team to reach out and qualify them.
Thanks for downloading the Cold Outreach Benchmarks Report.
One thing we consistently see teams misinterpret is reply rate vs. meaningful conversation rate.
A 12–15% reply rate might look strong on paper, but if most of those replies are objections, opt-outs, or “not now,” the pipeline impact is much lower than expected.
In this year’s data, the gap between replies and qualified conversations widened significantly — especially in saturated markets.
That shift usually signals one of two things:
Messaging fatigue in the ICP
Over-personalization without real relevance
If you’re currently reviewing outbound performance, it might be worth auditing not just reply rate, but conversation quality.
Curious — which metric do you look at first when evaluating outbound success?
Regards,{{SenderName}}
Email #2 (if they clicked email #1)
Subject line: Where most outbound audits go wrong
Email body:
Hi {{FirstName}}, since you explored the benchmarks, here’s something we often uncover during outbound audits:
Teams optimize subject lines and personalization tokens…but ignore ICP sharpness.
In our campaigns, highly specialized companies often outperform broader “do-it-all” providers — simply because it’s easier to target one sharp pain than five vague ones.
When reply rates drop, it’s rarely just a copy issue.
It’s positioning.
If you’re experimenting with narrowing your ICP or refining messaging angles, I’d be happy to exchange notes.
Cheers,{{SenderName}}
Email #3 (soft transition towards sales, sent 7–10 days later if engagement continues)
Subject line: Would this be useful?
Email body:
Hi {{FirstName}},
If reviewing benchmarks raised questions about your current outbound performance, we’ve been running short diagnostic sessions where we:
Compare your reply rates to current market data
Identify fatigue signals in your ICP
Flag quick wins in messaging alignment
No pitch — just benchmarking against real campaign data.
Would it make sense to explore that?
{{SenderName}}
Why does this sequence work?
It follows the correct nurturing logic:
Reinforce insight
Deepen context
Introduce positioning
Convert softly
So you gradually move the lead through Curiosity → Reflection → Relevance → Conversation instead of abruptly jumping from “Downloaded report” → “Book demo.”
#2. Blog subscriber sequences
These are long-term credibility builders. We use them to:
Keep our brand top of mind
Highlight and reinforce our expertise
Surface patterns across content
This is slow-burning nurturing, which builds familiarity rather than forcing urgency. Here’s an example of such a sequence.
Email #1 (welcome + positioning)
Subject line options:
Before you read the next post…
A quick note on what we’ll share here
What you’ll actually get from us
What most outbound advice gets wrong
Email body:
Hi {{FirstName}}, thanks for subscribing.
Quick heads up — we don’t send “marketing tips.”
We share:
- What’s actually changing in outbound
- What’s breaking in demand gen
- What’s working across 90+ industries
- And what most teams are misdiagnosing
You’ll get 1–2 emails per month.
To start, here’s a piece that challenges common assumptions about reply rates:
👉 (link to the relevant content piece)
More coming soon,
{{SenderName}}
Email #2 (pattern recognition, sent 5–7 days later)
Subject line: We’re seeing this across SaaS teams right now
Email body:
Hey {{FirstName}},
We keep hearing that outbound “doesn’t work anymore.” But what we’re actually seeing is fragmentation.
Some markets are saturated. Others are still wide open.
Some industries respond to email. Others move only after LinkedIn engagement or event triggers.
The teams struggling most are optimizing tactics instead of diagnosing fit. Conversely, the teams that are seeing stable performance have:
- Narrowed their ICP
- Reduced outreach volume
- Switched from pitch-driven copy to problem framing
- And, finally, aligned messaging with timing signals
We broke this down in more detail here:
👉 (link to the relevant content piece)
If outbound is part of your strategy, this shift is worth paying attention to.
Regards,
{{SenderName}}
Email #3 (immediate value, sent 10–14 days later)
Subject line: Quick audit you can run this week
Email body:
Hi {{FirstName}},
If outbound performance feels inconsistent, here’s a simple 3-step audit:
- Are you targeting accounts actively hiring for roles tied to your solution?
- Has your messaging changed in the last 6 months?
- Are you tracking conversation quality, not just reply rate?
If the answers to two of these are “no,” that’s likely your bottleneck.
We’ve seen this pattern repeatedly across SaaS teams scaling past $15M ARR.
More context is available here, if it’d be useful:
👉 (link to the relevant content piece)
Best,{{SenderName}}
Email #4 (soft persona-specific branching, sent 20–25 days later)
Subject line: Depends on what you’re optimizing for…
Email body:
Hi {{FirstName}}, what we noticed is that different teams struggle with different parts of revenue execution.
Out of curiosity — which side are you closer to right now?
We’re planning a deeper breakdown next month based on that.
Will be happy to hear your thoughts,{{Sender Name}}
Email #5 (authority builder, sent 30–40 days later)
Subject line: What we learned from 25,000+ contacts
Email body:
Hi {{FirstName}},
After analyzing outreach across 25,000+ contacts, one thing became obvious: Highly specialized companies often outperform category leaders in reply rates.
Why?
Because it’s easier to target one sharp pain than to present five broad value propositions. Broad positioning feels safe internally, but sharp positioning converts externally.
If you’re revisiting messaging this quarter, that distinction might matter more than channel choice.
We’ll be sharing more data soon.
Cheers,{{SenderName}}
Why does this sequence work?
It builds:
Credibility before positioning
Familiarity before conversion
Authority before pitch
And it allows engagement scoring to determine the next steps.
If at any point this subscriber:
Clicks multiple times
Engages deeply
Registers for a webinar
Downloads gated content
They move into:
A monthly insight newsletter
Quarterly benchmark highlights
Event-based invites
Intent-based routing if engagement spikes
Or SDR-supported activation
Thus, you can either continue nurturing or switch to sales-based conversations.
#3. Closed-lost re-engagement sequence
Many companies mark deals as closed-lost and move on.
We don’t.
We believe that even lost opportunities can be won; that’s why we segment all closed-lost contacts into several groups:
General reactivation
Competitor switchers
Potential in-house decision makers
Each group receives different messaging to meet their needs. For example:
Competitor switchers might get:
Industry comparisons
Migration case studies
ROI breakdowns
In-house decision makers might get:
“Build vs. buy” frameworks
Cost-of-delay analysis
Internal resource calculators
This way, we make our personalization strategic and address decision logic.
Take an example of a sequence targeting competitor switchers:
Email #1 (soft re-entry)
Subject line options:
Curious how things are going with {{Competitor}}
Quick check-in — no pitch
Still relevant?
Email body:
Hi {{FirstName}},
Last time we spoke, you decided to move forward with {{Competitor}}, which totally made sense at the time.
Out of curiosity — how has the experience been so far?
We’ve been seeing a few common friction points teams run into after 6–9 months:
Even if you stay with {{Competitor}}, this framework might help identify optimization gaps internally.
If it sparks any questions, I’m here.
Otherwise, appreciate your time and wishing you smooth scaling ahead.
All the best,
{{SenderName}}
Why does this sequence work?
This sequence:
Is non-aggressive, pattern-based
Doesn’t accuse
Opens the door for dissatisfaction
De-risks switching
Normalizes reconsideration
Signals expertise without attacking the competitor
Provides direct proof
Positions you as a safe alternative
Ends on value, not silence
Keeps authority intact
Makes you helpful even if they don’t switch
Overall, remember that competitor switchers are experienced buyers, so your tone should signal:
Maturity
Market awareness
Respect
Structural superiority
Handled right, they convert faster than net-new prospects. Handled poorly, they disappear permanently.
Personalization in nurturing vs. outbound
We’ve said it multiple times and won’t get tired of repeating it: Personalization goes far beyond mentioning the company name or referencing a recent LinkedIn post.
Truly tailored messages are either trigger-based or behavioral — and that’s the key differentiating factor between outbound and nurturing personalization.
Trigger-based outbound personalization
Behavioral personalization in nurturing
New C-level hire
Regulatory shift
Event attendance
Public funding
Market expansion
What content have they clicked repeatedly?
Did they engage with case studies or frameworks?
Did they spend time on pricing or comparison pages?
Did they revisit the same topic multiple times?
Did they attend a webinar but not book a call?
Where did the previous deal stall?
Which one is better? Depends on your goals, timeframe, and the stage your prospect is at.
“Outbound removes the ‘top’ layer, the high-intent prospects. But not everyone is ready at the same time. That’s where nurturing becomes critical. You can’t predict exactly when a company will decide to move forward, but if you stay in their informational field — educating, staying visible, and relevant — the chances that they come back when timing aligns are much higher.””
Lead generation and sales activation (bottom of the funnel)
Goal: Start meaningful conversations that convert.
There’s a common narrative that outbound no longer works. But what we consistently see is this: Yes, generic outbound doesn’t work. Contextual outbound still does.
“Right now, writing ‘Hi, want to book an appointment?’ almost doesn’t work anywhere. It has to be smarter than that.”
So, what actually starts conversations today? Based on our campaign experience across 90+ industries, outbound that works tends to fall into one of these categories.
Networking-style outreach
Instead of pitching, you initiate a peer-level exchange.
For example, rather than saying:
“We help companies improve outbound performance.”
Try this:
“We’ve been analyzing reply rate shifts across your industry and noticed something interesting about ICP fatigue. Curious if you’re seeing similar patterns?”
Such an approach invites perspective and doesn’t sound pushy.
Insight-led messaging
Buyers respond when you help them interpret their environment.
For example:
Regulatory changes affecting compliance
Market saturation trends
Performance benchmark gaps
Operational inefficiencies that are common at their stage
It’s more about saying, “Here’s what we’re seeing across your market.”
Trigger-based timing
Outbound personalization, at its best, is signal-driven. Typical triggers we use:
New C-level hires
Regulatory shifts
Industry event attendance
Public funding
Market expansion
These signals create natural conversation openings. But here’s the nuance: Triggers don’t guarantee intent. They just create relevance, and intent still has to be uncovered.
From our experience, event campaigns that target the trade shows’ and conferences’ attendees often perform exceptionally well because the context already exists. What’s more, prospects are in networking mode, expect conversations to happen, and are more eager to book short meetings.
But what we noticed is that high meeting volume doesn’t always mean high qualification.
That’s why event-based outreach is ideal when:
The goal is to start conversations
The company wants exposure
The sales team can qualify post-meeting
If leadership expects every booked call to be a sales-ready opportunity, expectations must be recalibrated.
Email marketing as part of an omnichannel strategy
Though we still see emails (both inbound and outbound) as a powerful tool serving multiple purposes, it works better when combined with other channels.
Let’s review several possible scenarios of how email can reinforce different touchpoints (and vice versa).
Email + LinkedIn
Email builds a structured narrative. LinkedIn builds familiarity. Used together, they create layered exposure.
How it works in real life:
Email introduces a core insight.
LinkedIn reinforces it through connection notes, posts, or comments.
As a result, prospects see consistent positioning across platforms.
But it’s not a silver bullet. Sometimes this exact combination won’t help.
“LinkedIn and email don’t always work as a strict combo, and that’s something teams often misunderstand.
Different roles live in different channels. Marketers and HR leaders tend to be more active and responsive on LinkedIn. Finance leaders or operations executives, on the other hand, are often more reachable via email. So forcing the same channel mix across every persona usually leads to friction.
The message has to stay strategically consistent — the same positioning, the same problem framing — but the tone and delivery should adapt to the channel and the person. LinkedIn might be lighter and more conversational. Email can go deeper and be more structured.
Right now, writing ‘Hi, want to book an appointment?’ almost doesn’t work anywhere. It has to be smarter than that.”
Still, LinkedIn can effectively reinforce email. Let’s see some examples of that.
Example #1 (insight + social reinforcement)
Step 1 — Email
Subject line: Outbound fatigue is rising in saturated ICPs
The email shares:
Benchmark data
Pattern recognition
A short tactical takeaway
Step 2 — LinkedIn
Two days later, SDR connects with:
“Hi {{FirstName}}, we’ve been analyzing reply rate shifts across {{Industry}} — especially around ICP saturation. Thought it might be relevant to connect.”
At the same time, the founder posts on LinkedIn about a widening gap between reply rates and meaningful conversation rates, citing numbers to support it.
Now the prospect:
Saw the structured argument in the email
Sees the same pattern publicly discussed
Experiences consistency
Example #2 (event-based coordination)
Email:
“Noticed you’ll be attending {{Conference}} and decided to share a short breakdown of the common outbound pitfalls we’ll be discussing there.”
LinkedIn:
SDR sends a connection request:
“Saw you’re attending {{Conference}} as well — curious what sessions you’re prioritizing.”
And then the founder posts live takeaways from the event.
This feels organic, as the email initiates context and LinkedIn personalizes it.
Example #3 (persona-specific adaptation)
Let’s say the general narrative is “Segment precision matters more than volume.”
To a VP of Marketing, LinkedIn might say: “Curious how you’re balancing scale vs. segmentation this quarter?”
To a CFO, an email might say: “Teams scaling outbound volume without narrowing ICP are seeing declining ROI efficiency.”
So, the strategic core stays the same, but the tone and emphasis shift and adapt to each channel.
Example #4 (nurturing → LinkedIn visibility)
Say the prospect clicks two nurture emails about lifecycle friction, and you get no reply/engagement.
Instead of pushing harder via email, SDR can:
View their LinkedIn profile
Engage with a relevant post
Share a neutral industry insight
This reduces perceived pressure, and when a follow-up email arrives later, it will feel familiar.
When marketing and outbound emails align, the prospect experiences consistency.
They don’t feel like two different teams are approaching them with two different agendas. They hear the same narrative, reinforced from multiple angles.
We noticed that such alignment improves pipeline velocity by at least 34%.
Here are a few examples of syncing the messages:
Example #1 (insight → activation)
Marketing layer
The newsletter shares benchmark data about declining reply rates in broad ICPs.
Outbound layer
“We’ve been working with several companies in your space facing similar reply rate compression — particularly where the ICP scope is broad. Are you experiencing something similar?”
Example #2 (event → SDR acceleration)
Marketing layer
Email promotes a webinar on sustainability compliance shifts, and the prospect registers for it.
Outbound layer
“Noticed you registered for the compliance webinar — curious whether this is tied to an upcoming regulatory deadline on your side?”
Example #3 (case study → direct relevance)
Marketing layer
Email shares a case study of a company switching from a competitor due to reporting limitations.
Outbound layer
“We recently helped a team migrate after encountering reporting constraints at scale — if that’s ever relevant, happy to share what’s changed structurally.”
When prospects recognize your narrative across channels, they don’t need to “relearn” who you are at every touchpoint. And that familiarity speeds up progression down the funnel.
The key point here is that email introduces the narrative and retargeting sustains it, keeping you visible.
In long B2B cycles
Buyers rarely convert after one interaction.
Decision-making involves multiple stakeholders.
Internal discussions happen offline.
And that’s where visibility and familiarity come in handy: if the stakeholders have seen you multiple times, it reduces perceived risk, so your chances of standing out among similar solutions or services are higher.
Retargeting also solves a common B2B problem: your email might reach one stakeholder, while retargeting can cover the whole buying committee. For instance:
VP of Sales receives a nurture email.
CFO later sees a retargeting ad about ROI efficiency.
Marketing Director sees a LinkedIn ad about campaign optimization.
A few more examples of combining email marketing or outreach with ads:
Example #1
Email introduces: Micro-lesson on reply rate compression.
Retargeting reinforces: Short visual breakdown of segmentation strategy.
Example #2
Email shares: Case study about competitor switch.
Retargeting reinforces: Quote snippet from that case study.
Example #3
Email promotes: Webinar about regulatory shifts.
Retargeting reinforces: Reminder ad framed around industry impact.
When aligned, this combination:
Extends message lifespan
Builds subconscious familiarity
Reduces friction at the decision stage
Supports multi-threaded deals
It ensures your narrative doesn’t disappear after one open.
And instead of: Touch → Silence → Restart later
You get: Touch → Reinforcement → Recognition → Action
Why email sequences should focus on intent, not volume
Once, we believed more outreach meant more growth, but the TerraScope case became a turning point.
When they first approached us, we used the classic strategy: large prospect lists and high-volume outreach. In the first 6 months, the results looked solid — we booked 54 meetings in Q1 and 40 in Q2. But then the amount began to drop: 25 meetings in Q3 and only 7 in Q4. By the end of the year:
The total addressable market was exhausted.
Engagement started dropping.
Only 25% of meetings were truly sales-qualified.
Instead of finding new audiences, we asked a different question: what if the problem isn’t reach but relevance?
So, we:
Restructured the journey
Mapped the buying committee (CSOs, Sustainability Managers, Procurement, CFOs)
Moved from high-volume outbound to a targeted, omnichannel, full-funnel playbook
Build sequences around intent signals, persona behavior, and stage progression
And here are just a few of the results we got:
2x more sales-ready meetings with large companies in Q2
$2.2M total pipeline generated
The TerraScope case taught us something critical:
Growth comes from tightening relevance at every stage.
Email sequences shouldn’t be designed around volume targets. They should be designed around intent progression.
Sending more emails fills inboxes, but sending smarter emails fills pipelines.
We believe that you shouldn’t measure email performance in isolation. That’s why we pay more attention to:
Stage movement
Conversation quality
Pipeline impact
Let’s see some examples of what we track at each stage of the funnel.
Awareness stage: Are we building trust or just getting opens?
At the top of the funnel, open rate is the most overrated metric.
As Tetiana Musina, our HubSpot Implementation Specialist, puts it:
“We don’t look at opens as a success signal. We look at engagement: CTR, replies, time spent viewing the email, content downloads, and webinar registrations.”
That’s the difference between passive visibility and active interest.
For example, when we compared three newsletters:
Two focused on industry reports and expert webinars
One was a simple podcast roundup
The first two generated almost 3x higher CTR and click rates than the podcast-only email and significantly lower unsubscribe rates:
The message is clear: audiences don’t reward volume or curation alone. They engage with depth, relevance, and actionable insight.
So, at the awareness stage, we monitor:
Click-through rate (CTR)
Click rate
Replies
Webinar registrations
Content downloads
Engagement score growth
If none of these metrics grow, then awareness isn’t working, and we revisit our strategy.
Nurturing stage: Is engagement deepening?
Nurturing is meant to increase the signal strength, which is why we measure:
Engagement score growth
Repeated content interaction
Reply depth (short answer vs. meaningful exchange)
Return visits
Pipeline stage movement
The growth of engagement score is the primary signal for moving someone deeper into the funnel, but we pay attention to other behavioral changes, too.
Outbound and direct sales: Are we creating meaningful conversations?
We’ve talked a lot about the importance of hyper-relevant outreach. That’s why we measure outbound success by:
Sales-qualified meetings
Conversion to opportunity
Pipeline velocity
From our experience, tailored campaigns based on real market triggers (new hires, regulations, events, expansion signals) significantly increase meaningful conversation rates compared to broad campaigns.
And yes, such a shift requires more research, but it definitely pays off:
“Finding one truly relevant contact takes more time. But it brings better results than writing to everyone and hoping something sticks.”
To sum it up, if email is treated as a volume machine, it fails. To bring results, it should be part of a structured buyer journey.
Before sending any message, think of:
Who exactly are we targeting — and why?
What stage are they in?
What problem are they aware of (or unaware of)?
What signal tells us they’re ready to move forward?
Without those answers, even the best copy won’t convert.
One more key point to remember is that strategy always comes first. You can use multiple channels in isolation, but they only really work when they are orchestrated:
Email builds structured depth.
LinkedIn builds familiarity.
Calls create immediacy.
Content builds authority.
Retargeting reinforces memory.
Because at the end of the day, the goal isn’t to increase open rates; it’s to start conversations with people who are actually ready to have them.
And that only happens when email isn’t a campaign but part of a coordinated system designed around intent.
Subscribe to our blog
Get the ultimate insights on the B2B trends and hands-on tips from sales professionals.
Yevheniia has been a professional copywriter since 2014. Her vast experience in writing for marketing, e-commerce, fin-tech, and pharmaceutical businesses in B2B and B2C enables her to craft resonating content of any complexity.
Expert
Margaret Lee
CMO at Belkins
Margaret is a seasoned professional with over 14 years of experience and a remarkable track record of managing marketing teams in both B2B and B2C. With expertise in strategy development, analytics-driven decision-making, and team management, she brings invaluable skills to drive growth and success.